Achieving "transparency, consistency and fairness" in English HE admissions: progress since Schwartz?

Journal article


Adnett, Nick, McCaig Colin, Slack, Kim and Bowers-Brown, Tamsin 2010. Achieving "transparency, consistency and fairness" in English HE admissions: progress since Schwartz? Higher education quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2010.00468.x
AuthorsAdnett, Nick, McCaig Colin, Slack, Kim and Bowers-Brown, Tamsin
Abstract

In 2004 the Schwartz Review advised English higher education institutions that their admissions systems should: be transparent; select students who are able to complete their courses based upon achievements and potential; use assessment methods that are reliable and valid; minimise barriers to applicants; be professional; and be underpinned by appropriate institutional structures and processes. These five principles were only expressed as recommendations, reflecting the reluctance of policy makers to interfere with individual higher education institutions' admissions policies. This article analyses the results of research that reviewed the progress that English higher education institutions had made in implementing the Schwartz recommendations and assess whether a more interventionist stance is required to achieve fair admissions.

Year2010
JournalHigher education quarterly
PublisherWiley
ISSN1468-2273
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2010.00468.x
Web address (URL)http://hdl.handle.net/10545/622382
hdl:10545/622382
Publication dates27 Oct 2010
Publication process dates
Deposited19 Mar 2018, 14:25
ContributorsSheffield Hallam University
Permalink -

https://repository.derby.ac.uk/item/9377v/achieving-transparency-consistency-and-fairness-in-english-he-admissions-progress-since-schwartz

  • 10
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as