Delphi with feedback of rationales: how large can a Delphi group be such that participants are not overloaded, de-motivated, or disengaged?

Journal article


Belton, I., Wright, G., Rowe, G., Bolger, F., Crawford, M., Hamlin, I., Sissons, A., Taylor Browne Luka, C. and Vasilichi, V. 2021. Delphi with feedback of rationales: how large can a Delphi group be such that participants are not overloaded, de-motivated, or disengaged? Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 170, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120897
AuthorsBelton, I., Wright, G., Rowe, G., Bolger, F., Crawford, M., Hamlin, I., Sissons, A., Taylor Browne Luka, C. and Vasilichi, V.
Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the effect of Delphi group size and opinion diversity on group members’ information load as well as on their overall experience of the Delphi process - in terms of task involvement (enjoyment and interest) and in terms of group sway (the influence and helpfulness of others’ rationales). For Delphi applications involving the exchange of rationales between participants, we found no evidence that group sizes of up to 19 participants cause information overload or de-motivation and disengagement of participants.

KeywordsDelphi; group processes; information load; information overload
Year2021
JournalTechnological Forecasting and Social Change
Journal citation170, pp. 1-10
PublisherElsevier
ISSN1873-5509
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120897
Web address (URL)https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162521003292
https://arro.anglia.ac.uk/id/eprint/706643/
Accepted author manuscript
License
File Access Level
Open
Publisher's version
File Access Level
Controlled
Output statusPublished
Publication dates
Online04 Jun 2021
Publication process dates
Accepted17 May 2021
Deposited31 Jul 2023
Permalink -

https://repository.derby.ac.uk/item/9zxzz/delphi-with-feedback-of-rationales-how-large-can-a-delphi-group-be-such-that-participants-are-not-overloaded-de-motivated-or-disengaged

Download files


Accepted author manuscript
Belton et al Delphi with feedback of rationales.pdf
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
File access level: Open

  • 19
    total views
  • 20
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Can Induced Awe Reduce Anti-Gay Prejudice in Heterosexual Adults and Does the Need for Closure Moderate this Effect?
Gupta, P. and Hamlin, I. 2024. Can Induced Awe Reduce Anti-Gay Prejudice in Heterosexual Adults and Does the Need for Closure Moderate this Effect? Graduate Student Journal of Psychology. 22, pp. 63-76. https://doi.org/10.52214/gsjp.v22i1.12073
Connection for conservation: The impact of counting butterflies on nature connectedness and wellbeing in citizen scientists
Butler, C., Hamlin, I., Richardson, M., Lowe, M. and Fox, R. 2024. Connection for conservation: The impact of counting butterflies on nature connectedness and wellbeing in citizen scientists. Biological Conservation. 292, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110497
The benefits of citizen science and nature‐noticing activities for well‐being, nature connectedness and pro‐nature conservation behaviours
Michael J. O. Pocock, Iain Hamlin, Jennifer Christelow, Holli‐Anne Passmore and Miles Richardson 2023. The benefits of citizen science and nature‐noticing activities for well‐being, nature connectedness and pro‐nature conservation behaviours. People and Nature. pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10432
The Joy of birds: the effect of rating for joy or counting garden bird species on wellbeing, anxiety, and nature connection
White, M. E., Iain Hamlin, Carly W. Butler and Miles Richardson 2023. The Joy of birds: the effect of rating for joy or counting garden bird species on wellbeing, anxiety, and nature connection. Urban Ecosystems. pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-023-01334-y
Structured groups make more accurate veracity judgements than individuals
Hamlin, Iain, Bolger, Fergus, Vasilichi, Alexandrina, Belton, Ian, Crawford, Megan, M., Sissons, Aileen, Taylor Browne Lūka, Courtney and Wright, George 2021. Structured groups make more accurate veracity judgements than individuals. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 35 (6), pp. 1600-1607. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3892
Country-level factors in a failing relationship with nature: Nature connectedness as a key metric for a sustainable future
Richardson, M., Hamlin, I., Elliot, L. and White, M. P. 2022. Country-level factors in a failing relationship with nature: Nature connectedness as a key metric for a sustainable future. Ambio. 51, p. 2201–2213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01744-w
Visible Garden Biodiversity Leads to an Increase in Noticing Nature, Which in Turn Leads to an Increase in Nature Connectedness
Iain Hamlin and Miles Richardson 2022. Visible Garden Biodiversity Leads to an Increase in Noticing Nature, Which in Turn Leads to an Increase in Nature Connectedness. Mary Ann Liebert Inc. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/uamwg
Nature connectedness, nonattachment and engagement with nature’s beauty predict pro-nature conservation behaviour
Barrows, P., Richardson, M., Hamlin, I. and Van Gordon, W. 2022. Nature connectedness, nonattachment and engagement with nature’s beauty predict pro-nature conservation behaviour. Ecopsychology. 14 (2), pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2021.0036
Nature Engagement for Human and Nature’s Wellbeing during the Corona Pandemic.
Miles Richardson and Iain Hamlin 2021. Nature Engagement for Human and Nature’s Wellbeing during the Corona Pandemic. Emerald. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/kd7bz
Actively Noticing Nature (Not Just Time in Nature) Helps Promote Nature Connectedness
Richardson, Miles, Hamlin, Iain, Butler, Carly, Thomas, Rory and Hunt, Alex 2021. Actively Noticing Nature (Not Just Time in Nature) Helps Promote Nature Connectedness. Ecopsychology. 14 (1), pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2021.0023