Area and individual differences in personal crime victimization incidence.

Journal article


Tseloni, Andromachi and Pease, Ken 2014. Area and individual differences in personal crime victimization incidence. International Review of Victimology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269758014547991
AuthorsTseloni, Andromachi and Pease, Ken
Abstract

This article examines how personal crime differences between areas and between individuals are predicted by area and population heterogeneity and their synergies. It draws on lifestyle/routine activities and social disorganization theories to model the number of personal victimization incidents over individuals including routine activities and area characteristics, respectively, as well as their (cross-cluster) interactions. The methodology employs multilevel or hierarchical negative binomial regression with extra binomial variation using data from the British Crime Survey and the UK Census. Personal crime rates differ substantially across areas, reflecting to a large degree the clustering of individuals with measured vulnerability factors in the same areas. Most factors suggested by theory and previous research are conducive to frequent personal victimization except the following new results. Pensioners living alone in densely populated areas face disproportionally high numbers of personal crimes. Frequent club and pub visits are associated with more personal crimes only for males and adults living with young children, respectively. Ethnic minority individuals experience fewer personal crimes than whites. The findings suggest integrating social disorganization and lifestyle theories and prioritizing resources to the most vulnerable, rather than all, residents of poor and densely populated areas to prevent personal crimes.

KeywordsArea predictors; Crime counts; Criminal justice; Criminal victimization
Year2014
JournalInternational Review of Victimology
PublisherSage
ISSN02697580
20479433
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1177/0269758014547991
Web address (URL)http://hdl.handle.net/10545/622168
hdl:10545/622168
Publication dates02 Sep 2014
Publication process dates
Deposited19 Feb 2018, 11:03
Rights

Archived with thanks to International Review of Victimology

ContributorsLoughborough University, Loughborough University, UK and Loughborough University, UK
File
File Access Level
Open
Permalink -

https://repository.derby.ac.uk/item/9335q/area-and-individual-differences-in-personal-crime-victimization-incidence

Download files

  • 32
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Wise Policing: Soft Skills and Strong Principles
Moss, K. and Pease, K. 2022. Wise Policing: Soft Skills and Strong Principles . in: Kilgallon, M. and Wright, M. (ed.) Behavioural Skills for Policing: The Service Speaks St Albans Critical Publishing.
Built environment attributes and crime: an automated machine learning approach
Dakin, Kyle, Parkinson, Simon, Saad, Kahn, Monchuck, Leanne and Pease, Ken 2020. Built environment attributes and crime: an automated machine learning approach. Crime Science. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-020-00122-9
Police misconduct, protraction and the mental health of accused police officers
McDaniel, John L.M., Moss, Kate, Pease, Ken and Singh, Paramjit 2020. Police misconduct, protraction and the mental health of accused police officers. in: Routledge.
First-generation immigrant judgements of offence seriousness: evidence from the crime survey for England and Wales
Los, Greg, Ignatans, Dainis and Pease, Ken 2017. First-generation immigrant judgements of offence seriousness: evidence from the crime survey for England and Wales. Crime Prevention and Community Safety. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41300-017-0019-2
Evolutionary Psychology and Terrorism
Taylor, Max, Roach, Jason and Pease, Ken 2016. Evolutionary Psychology and Terrorism. Routledge.
Terrorism's footprint of fear
Roach, Jason, Pease, Ken and Charlotte, Sanson 2016. Terrorism's footprint of fear. in: Routledge.
Taking crime seriously: Playing the weighting game
Ignatans, Dainis and Pease, Ken 2015. Taking crime seriously: Playing the weighting game. Policing. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pav029.
Police overestimation of criminal career homogeneity
Pease, Ken and Roach, Jason 2013. Police overestimation of criminal career homogeneity. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1405
Area and individual differences in personal crime victimisation incidence: The role of individual, lifestyle/routine activities and contextual predictors
Pease, Ken and Andromachi, Tseloni 2014. Area and individual differences in personal crime victimisation incidence: The role of individual, lifestyle/routine activities and contextual predictors. International Review of Victimology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269758014547991
Voles don't take taxis
Pease, Ken 2014. Voles don't take taxis. Legal and Criminological Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12056
Are victims of crime mostly angry or mostly afraid?
Ignatans, Dainis and Pease, Ken 2019. Are victims of crime mostly angry or mostly afraid? Crime Prevention and Community Safety.
Whatever happened to repeat victimisation?
Pease, Ken, Ignatans, Dainis and Batty, Lauren 2018. Whatever happened to repeat victimisation? Crime Prevention and Community Safety.
Is it just a guessing game? The application of crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) to predict burglary.
Monchuk, Leanne, Pease, Ken and Armitage, Rachel 2018. Is it just a guessing game? The application of crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) to predict burglary. Planning Practice & Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2018.1510276
Crime concentrations: Hot dots, hot spots and hot flushes.
Ignatans, Dainis and Pease, Ken 2018. Crime concentrations: Hot dots, hot spots and hot flushes. in: Oxford University Press.
Preventing repeat and near repeat crime concentrations.
Farrell, Graham and Pease, Ken 2017. Preventing repeat and near repeat crime concentrations. in: Routledge.
Repeat victimisation.
Farrell, Graham and Pease, Ken 2016. Repeat victimisation. in: Routledge.
What have criminologists done for us lately?
Farrell, Graham and Pease, Ken 2014. What have criminologists done for us lately? in: Palgrave Macmillan.
A situational approach to heritage crime prevention.
Grove, Louise and Pease, Ken 2014. A situational approach to heritage crime prevention. in: Palgrave Macmillan.
Preventing crime and evoking altruism.
Pease, Ken 2014. Preventing crime and evoking altruism. in: Springer.
Distributive justice and the crime drop.
Ignatans, Dainis and Pease, Ken 2015. Distributive justice and the crime drop. in: Palgrave Macmillan.
How to morph experience into evidence.
Roach, Jason and Pease, Ken 2017. How to morph experience into evidence. in: Routledge.
Self-selection policing: Theory, research and practice.
Roach, Jason and Pease, Ken 2016. Self-selection policing: Theory, research and practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
Using modeling to predict and prevent victimization.
Pease, Ken and Tseloni, Andromachi 2014. Using modeling to predict and prevent victimization. Springer.
Preventing repeat and near repeat crime concentrations.
Farrell, Graham and Pease, Ken 2017. Preventing repeat and near repeat crime concentrations. in: Routledge.
On whom does the burden of crime fall now? Changes over time in counts and concentration.
Ignatans, Dainis and Pease, Ken 2015. On whom does the burden of crime fall now? Changes over time in counts and concentration. International Review of Victimology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269758015610854