Laon and Cythna and The Revolt of Islam: revisions as transition.
Journal article
Authors | Whickman, Paul |
---|---|
Abstract | The enforced amendments made to Laon and Cythna following its withdrawal from publication in December 1817 are generally regarded as workmanlike and prudent, sacrificing aesthetic merit in the name of compromise and self-censorship. There remain, however, few detailed readings of these modifications that go beyond subjective responses. To this end, this article offers a reading of these revisions arguing that although some are indeed functional alterations, other amendments serve thematic and aesthetic ends. One of Shelley’s most common changes, that of changing the word ‘God’ to ‘Power’, is a case in point. Since a key theme of the poem is of the collusion between political and religious tyranny, Shelley’s alteration of ‘God’ to ‘Power’ makes this connection more explicit. From this, this article concludes that these revisions signal, analogously at the very least, a transitioning point in Shelley’s thought and career. Whereas Queen Mab (1813) refers explicitly to ‘God’, later works such as Prometheus Unbound (1820) settle upon the term ‘Power’. The fact that we see Shelley move from one to the other between Laon and Cythna and The Revolt of Islam is therefore significant. |
The enforced amendments made to Laon and Cythna following its withdrawal from publication in December 1817 are generally regarded as workmanlike and prudent, sacrificing aesthetic merit in the name of compromise and self-censorship. There remain, however, few detailed readings of these modifications that go beyond subjective responses. To this end, this article offers a reading of these revisions arguing that although some are indeed functional alterations, other amendments serve thematic and aesthetic ends. One of Shelley’s most common changes, that of changing the word ‘God’ to ‘Power’, is a case in point. Since a key theme of the poem is of the collusion between political and religious tyranny, Shelley’s alteration of ‘God’ to ‘Power’ makes this connection more explicit. | |
Keywords | Shelley; Censorship; Revision; Blasphemy; Power; God |
Year | 2018 |
Journal | Keats-Shelley Review |
Publisher | Taylor & Francis |
ISSN | 0952-4142 |
2042-1362 | |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1080/09524142.2018.1520461 |
Web address (URL) | http://hdl.handle.net/10545/623054 |
hdl:10545/623054 | |
Publication dates | 16 Oct 2018 |
Publication process dates | |
Deposited | 18 Oct 2018, 13:07 |
Accepted | 27 Jun 2018 |
Contributors | University of Derby |
File | File Access Level Open |
File | File Access Level Open |
https://repository.derby.ac.uk/item/93x6w/laon-and-cythna-and-the-revolt-of-islam-revisions-as-transition
Download files
24
total views7
total downloads2
views this month0
downloads this month
Export as
Related outputs

Teaching ‘freedom of speech’ freely
Whickman, Paul 2020. Teaching ‘freedom of speech’ freely. in: The free speech wars Manchester University Press.
Blasphemy and politics in romantic literature: Creativity in the writing of Percy Bysshe Shelley
Whickman, Paul 2020. Blasphemy and politics in romantic literature: Creativity in the writing of Percy Bysshe Shelley. Springer International Publishing.Literature 1780–1830: the Romantic Period.
Branagh-Miscampbell, Maxine, Leonardi, Barbara, Whickman, Paul, Ward, Matthew and Halsey, Katie 2018. Literature 1780–1830: the Romantic Period. The Year's Work in English Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/ywes/may008
Literature 1780–1830: The Romantic Period.
Branagh-miscampbell, Maxine, Leonardi, Barbara, Whickman, Paul, Ward, Matthew and Miranda, Omar F. 2017. Literature 1780–1830: The Romantic Period. The Year's Work in English Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/ywes/max014
Literature 1780–1830: The Romantic Period
Branagh-miscampbell, Maxine, O’Brien, Eliza, Ward, Matthew, Whickman, Paul and Dennis, Chrisy 2016. Literature 1780–1830: The Romantic Period. The Year's Work in English Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/ywes/maw010