Children and the doctrine of substituted judgement.

Journal article


Cherkassky, L. 2014. Children and the doctrine of substituted judgement. Medical Law International. https://doi.org/10.1177/0968533215571955
AuthorsCherkassky, L.
Abstract

The common law in the United Kingdom dictates that children facing medical treatment should be treated in accordance with their best interests. The Children Act 1989 also demands that the welfare of the child is paramount. However, in light of the creation of saviour siblings after the case of Quintavalle, it is disputed that the donor child is treated in accordance with his/her best interests when undergoing a non-therapeutic procedure for the benefit of another. The Human Tissue Authority (HTA) can, for example, validate a bone marrow harvest on a child created specifically for harvest without the consent of the High Court. The doctrine of substituted judgement was developed in the United States to substitute a previously competent adult decision, but it is proposed that parents of saviour siblings are reviving it in a modified form to install a speculative psychological benefit into the saviour child to satisfy the criteria for a harvest in common law. As a result, there is a glaring discrepancy between the objective jurisdiction of the courts and the validation of non-therapeutic harvesting procedures upon children by the HTA, opening the door to potential legal action.

KeywordsSaviour siblings; Bioethics; Donors; UK law
Year2014
JournalMedical Law International
PublisherSage
ISSN09685332
20479441
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1177/0968533215571955
Web address (URL)http://hdl.handle.net/10545/622154
hdl:10545/622154
Publication dates01 Dec 2014
Publication process dates
Deposited16 Feb 2018, 16:32
Rights

Archived with thanks to Medical Law International

ContributorsUniversity of Derby and The University of Derby, UK
File
File Access Level
Open
Permalink -

https://repository.derby.ac.uk/item/937zz/children-and-the-doctrine-of-substituted-judgement

Download files

  • 5
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

RE: AB (termination of pregnancy)[2019] EWA CIV 1215: ‘wishes and feelings’ under the mental capacity act 2005
Cherkassky, L. 2020. RE: AB (termination of pregnancy)[2019] EWA CIV 1215: ‘wishes and feelings’ under the mental capacity act 2005. Medical Law Review. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwaa009
Do parents have a right to determine where a child patient dies?
Cherkassky, L. 2019. Do parents have a right to determine where a child patient dies? in: Trivent Publishing.
Y v A Healthcare Trust and the Mental Capacity Act 2005: taking gamete retrieval to the bank
Cherkassky, L. 2019. Y v A Healthcare Trust and the Mental Capacity Act 2005: taking gamete retrieval to the bank. Law Quarterly Review.
Twenty-seven years of controversy: The perils of PGD
Cherkassky, L. 2018. Twenty-seven years of controversy: The perils of PGD. International Journal of Pediatrics and Neonatal Health.
Human tissue authority new draft code: Supporting child donors or supporting parents?
Cherkassky, L. 2017. Human tissue authority new draft code: Supporting child donors or supporting parents? Legal Issues Journal.
A gift or a waste? Quintavalle, surplus embryos and the Abortion Act 1967.
Cherkassky, L. 2017. A gift or a waste? Quintavalle, surplus embryos and the Abortion Act 1967. The New Bioethics. https://doi.org/10.1080/20502877.2017.1345089
Quintavalle: The quandry in bioethics
Cherkassky, L. 2016. Quintavalle: The quandry in bioethics. Journal of Law and Health.
The interfamilial principle and the harvest festival
Cherkassky, L. 2016. The interfamilial principle and the harvest festival. European Journal of Health Law. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718093-12341379
Selecting a disabled embryo can constitute grievous bodily harm
Cherkassky, L. 2015. Selecting a disabled embryo can constitute grievous bodily harm. Medico-Legal Journal of Ireland.
The wrong harvest: The law on saviour siblings
Cherkassky, L. 2015. The wrong harvest: The law on saviour siblings. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebu014
Gillick, bone marrow and teenagers
Cherkassky, L. 2015. Gillick, bone marrow and teenagers. Medico Legal Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/0025817215579170
The human tissue authority and saviour siblings
Cherkassky, L. 2015. The human tissue authority and saviour siblings. Journal of Bone Research. https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-8820.1000158
Text, cases and materials on medical law
Cherkassky, L. 2015. Text, cases and materials on medical law. Pearson.
Course notes: Criminal Law
Cherkassky, L. 2012. Course notes: Criminal Law. Routledge.
Does the US do it better? A comparative analysis of liver allocation protocols in the United Kingdom and the United States
Cherkassky, L. 2011. Does the US do it better? A comparative analysis of liver allocation protocols in the United Kingdom and the United States. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.
Legal skills
Cherkassky, L. 2011. Legal skills. Palgrave Macmillan.
The secret world of liver transplant candidate assessment
Cherkassky, L. 2011. The secret world of liver transplant candidate assessment. Medical Law International.
A fair trial? The assessment of liver transplant candidates with psychiatric illnesses
Cherkassky, L. 2011. A fair trial? The assessment of liver transplant candidates with psychiatric illnesses. Journal of Medical Ethics.
Being informed: the complexities of knowledge, deception and consent when transmitting HIV
Cherkassky, L. 2010. Being informed: the complexities of knowledge, deception and consent when transmitting HIV. Journal of Criminal Law.
Presumed consent in organ donation: is the duty finally upon us?
Cherkassky, L. 2010. Presumed consent in organ donation: is the duty finally upon us? European Journal of Health Law.
Rational rejection? the ethical complications of assessing organ transplant candidates in the UK and the USA
Cherkassky, L. 2010. Rational rejection? the ethical complications of assessing organ transplant candidates in the UK and the USA. Journal of Law and Medicine.
The meaning of "wrong" in the M'Naghten test
Cherkassky, L. 2009. The meaning of "wrong" in the M'Naghten test. Criminal Lawyer.
Engaging new Law lecturers and reflections on the engagement
Cherkassky, L., Gale, Christopher and Guth, Jessica 2009. Engaging new Law lecturers and reflections on the engagement. The Law Teacher.
Genocide: punishing a moral wrong
Cherkassky, L. 2009. Genocide: punishing a moral wrong. International Criminal Law Review.
Kennedy and unlawful act manslaughter: an unorthodox application of the doctrine of causation
Cherkassky, L. 2008. Kennedy and unlawful act manslaughter: an unorthodox application of the doctrine of causation. Journal of Criminal Law.
What distinguishes the evil of genocide and how should we respond to it?
Cherkassky, L. 2008. What distinguishes the evil of genocide and how should we respond to it? International Journal of Punishment and Sentencing.
R v Hendy: intoxication and diminished responsibility
Cherkassky, L. 2007. R v Hendy: intoxication and diminished responsibility. Journal of Criminal Law.