Evaluation for what purpose? Findings from two stakeholder groups

Book chapter


Wond, Tracey 2018. Evaluation for what purpose? Findings from two stakeholder groups. in: Springer Singapore.
AuthorsWond, Tracey
Abstract

A host of reasons exist for the pursuit of evidence in the public sector, including to support good governance and policy development. As the expectations for program evaluation from policymakers have evolved, so too has evaluation practice and a great deal of experimentalism has ensued. There is a risk that these developments and the complexity inherent in them, may lead to conflicting expectations about why program evaluation is done, or even a loss of purpose. This prompts the meso-level analysis of two types of stakeholders in a governance network, explored in this chapter. This chapter presents the findings of an ongoing study which explores the perceptions of program evaluators and policy implementers towards the purpose of evidence. The findings suggest that program evaluators and policy implementers have divergent expectations of why and how evaluation data might be used. The findings suggest that program evaluators aspire to support change and enhance the policy domains they serve, whereas policy implementers perceive program evaluation as serving a more governance-/management-orientated role. The chapter demonstrates the complexity of both program evaluation and policy and may have implications for the twin pillars of governance and responsibility at the heart of the book. If governance and responsibility are the twin pillars of sustainability then the complex networks of relationships, expectations, values, and outcomes may need to be considered. The findings also have implications for evaluation commissioners and practitioners, demonstrating the need for the purpose and expectations of program evaluation to be agreed early. The use of program evaluation as a symbolic, aesthetic or structural mechanism also emerges, prompting opportunity for further research, for instance, to explore legitimacy and program evaluation.

A host of reasons exist for the pursuit of evidence in the public sector, including to support good governance and policy development. As the expectations for program evaluation from policymakers have evolved, so too has evaluation practice and a great deal of experimentalism has ensued. There is a risk that these developments and the complexity inherent in them, may lead to conflicting expectations about why program evaluation is done, or even a loss of purpose. This prompts the meso-level analysis of two types of stakeholders in a governance network, explored in this chapter. This chapter presents the findings of an ongoing study which explores the perceptions of program evaluators and policy implementers towards the purpose of evidence.
The findings suggest that program evaluators and policy implementers have divergent expectations of why and how evaluation data might be used. The findings suggest that program evaluators aspire to support change and enhance the policy domains they serve, whereas policy implementers perceive program evaluation as serving a more governance-/management-orientated role.
The chapter demonstrates the complexity of both program evaluation and policy and may have implications for the twin pillars of governance and responsibility at the heart of the book. If governance and responsibility are the twin pillars of sustainability then the complex networks of relationships, expectations, values, and outcomes may need to be considered. The findings also have implications for evaluation commissioners and practitioners, demonstrating the need for the purpose and expectations of program evaluation to be agreed early. The use of program evaluation as a symbolic, aesthetic or structural mechanism also emerges, prompting opportunity for further research, for instance, to explore legitimacy and program evaluation.

Keywordsevaluation; misevaluation; Public sector; Governance
Year2018
PublisherSpringer Singapore
Web address (URL)http://hdl.handle.net/10545/622449
hdl:10545/622449
File
File
File Access Level
Open
Publication dates03 Jul 2018
Publication process dates
Deposited26 Mar 2018, 13:10
ContributorsUniversity of Derby
Permalink -

https://repository.derby.ac.uk/item/9222q/evaluation-for-what-purpose-findings-from-two-stakeholder-groups

Download files

  • 12
    total views
  • 1
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 1
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Personal agency and organisational attachment: A career capital perspective
Brown, Cathy, Hooley, Tristram and Wond, Tracey 2021. Personal agency and organisational attachment: A career capital perspective. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling. pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2021.1937940
The role and impact of executive coaching in the Maltese public sector
Borg Ellul, Duncan and Wond, Tracey 2020. The role and impact of executive coaching in the Maltese public sector. International Journal of Public Leadership. 16 (2), pp. 145-173. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpl-11-2019-0075
Building career capital: Helping workers to enhance career mobility in uncertain times
Wond, Tracey and Brown, Cathy 2019. Building career capital: Helping workers to enhance career mobility in uncertain times. Journal for Perspectives of Economic Political and Social Integretion. https://doi.org/10.18290/pepsi-2019-0001
Building career mobility: A critical exploration of career capital
Brown, Cathy and Wond, Tracey 2018. Building career mobility: A critical exploration of career capital. Journal of the National Institute for Career Education and Counselling. https://doi.org/10.20856/jnicec.4109
Career capital: Building our mobility within an evolving world of work.
Brown, Cathy and Wond, Tracey 2018. Career capital: Building our mobility within an evolving world of work. Career Matters.
Key skills and training needs of the D2N2 low carbon and environmental goods and services (LCEGS) sector
Paterson, Fred, Baranova, Polina, Neary, S., Hanson, Jill, Clarke, Lewis, Wond, Tracey, Lee, Amanda, Gill, J., Gallotta, Bruno, Eisen, Matthew and Nesterova, Iana 2018. Key skills and training needs of the D2N2 low carbon and environmental goods and services (LCEGS) sector. University of Derby.
Extending time – Extended benefits
Wond, Tracey and Macaulay, Michael 2011. Extending time – Extended benefits. Public Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2010.536059
Evaluating local implementation: An evidence based approach.
Wond, Tracey and Macaulay, Michael 2010. Evaluating local implementation: An evidence based approach. Policy and Society. https://doi.org//10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.03.008
Measuring the value of placements to employers: A cost-benefit approach
Wond, Tracey and Rambukwella, Shan 2018. Measuring the value of placements to employers: A cost-benefit approach. Industry and Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422218759726
Employee as Student Toolkit
Wond, Tracey, Nesterova, Iana, Rambukwella, Shan and Kelleher, Orla 2016. Employee as Student Toolkit.
Postgraduate Placement Toolkit
Wond, Tracey, Rambukwella, Shan, Nesterova, Iana and Kelleher, Orla 2016. Postgraduate Placement Toolkit.
Trust matters: Distrust in an external evaluation of a public sector program
Wond, Tracey 2016. Trust matters: Distrust in an external evaluation of a public sector program. International Journal of Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1126732
Police Officers with degrees: the plan, challenges and (missing) evidence
Wond, Tracey 2015. Police Officers with degrees: the plan, challenges and (missing) evidence. CoPaCC.