Investigating the predictors of COVID-19 vaccine decision-making among parents of children aged 5–11 in the UK

Journal article


Davey, S. A., Hampson, C., Christodoulaki, M.E. and Gaffiero, D. 2024. Investigating the predictors of COVID-19 vaccine decision-making among parents of children aged 5–11 in the UK. Vaccine. pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.05.069
AuthorsDavey, S. A., Hampson, C., Christodoulaki, M.E. and Gaffiero, D.
Abstract

Background
The global effort to combat the COVID-19 pandemic highlights the pivotal role of vaccination in public health, particularly considering emerging severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 variants. While priority has been given to immunising vulnerable populations, children remain a significant unvaccinated group, prompting NHS England to include them in their new vaccination strategy. The role parents play in child healthcare decisions, specifically regarding COVID-19 vaccination, is crucial, and the Health Belief Model (HBM) provides a framework for understanding parental vaccination behaviour.

Methods
To investigate the predictors influencing parental decision-making for COVID-19 vaccination in children aged 5–11, an online cross-sectional survey was conducted amongst parents (n = 206) living in the UK aged > 18, with one or more children aged 5–11. The present study measured HBM constructs, demographic factors, vaccine hesitancy and vaccine decision-making self-efficacy. Binomial logistic regression was used to analyse the responses of 206 participants using the child vaccination status (vaccinated vs. unvaccinated) as the outcome variable.

Findings
The regression model significantly predicted child vaccination status, identifying perceived barriers, cues to action and parent age as significant predictors. Higher cues to action and older parent age increased the likelihood of child vaccination, while greater perceived barriers decreased it. The model achieved 80.8 % overall accuracy by correctly identifying 87.6 % of vaccinated cases and 69.4 % of unvaccinated cases, demonstrating high accuracy in predicting parental vaccination decisions.

Conclusion
The present study contributes to our understanding of the factors shaping parental decision-making regarding COVID-19 child vaccination, highlighting the impact of perceived barriers, cues to action and parent age. Future public health campaigns should address the specific barriers faced by parents, emphasise external cues to action and tailor messaging to acknowledge age-related differences in parental vaccine decision-making. By addressing the aforementioned factors influencing parental behaviour regarding child vaccination, future interventions can increase the number of children vaccinated against COVID-19, preventing transmission, protecting from severe illness and contributing to the NHS vaccination strategy.

KeywordsCOVID-19; Parents; Children; Health Belief Model; Vaccine decision-making
Year2024
JournalVaccine
Journal citationpp. 1-6
PublisherElseiver
ISSN0264-410X
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.05.069
Web address (URL)https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24006467
Publisher's version
License
File Access Level
Open
Output statusPublished
Publication dates
Online14 Jun 2024
Publication process dates
Accepted29 May 2024
Deposited19 Jul 2024
Permalink -

https://repository.derby.ac.uk/item/q76z7/investigating-the-predictors-of-covid-19-vaccine-decision-making-among-parents-of-children-aged-5-11-in-the-uk

Download files


Publisher's version
Manuscript (Vaccine).pdf
License: CC BY 4.0
File access level: Open

  • 20
    total views
  • 10
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 1
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Parental Vaccine Hesitancy Dataset
Gaffiero, D., Hampson, C. and Davey, S. Parental Vaccine Hesitancy Dataset. University of Derby.
Interpretation Biases in Pain: Validation of Two New Stimulus Sets
Gaffiero, D., Staples, P., Staples, V. and Maratos, F. 2022. Interpretation Biases in Pain: Validation of Two New Stimulus Sets. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.784887
Do individuals with Chronic Pain show attentional bias to pain-related information? An early stage systematic review of the eye-tracking evidence.
Gaffiero, D., Elander, James and Maratos, Frances 2019. Do individuals with Chronic Pain show attentional bias to pain-related information? An early stage systematic review of the eye-tracking evidence. Cognitive Psychology Bulletin.
Evidence for a role of 5-HT2C receptors in the motor aspects of performance, but not the efficacy of food reinforcers, in a progressive ratio schedule
Bezzina, G., Cheung, T. H. C., Hampson, C., Bradshaw, C. M., Glennon, J. C. and Szabadi, E. 2014. Evidence for a role of 5-HT2C receptors in the motor aspects of performance, but not the efficacy of food reinforcers, in a progressive ratio schedule. Psychopharmacology. 232, p. 699–711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-014-3700-5