COVID-19 vaccination in children aged 5–11: a systematic review of parental barriers and facilitators in Western countries

Journal article


Davey, S. and Gaffiero, D. 2024. COVID-19 vaccination in children aged 5–11: a systematic review of parental barriers and facilitators in Western countries. Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy. 12, pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/25151355241288115
AuthorsDavey, S. and Gaffiero, D.
Abstract

Background:

Parental decision-making regarding vaccination, particularly for coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) where significant debate surrounds children aged 5–11, is influenced by various factors. Understanding the motivations behind parents’ vaccination choices for their children is crucial for maintaining vaccine uptake, in line with the National Health Service United Kingdom vaccination strategy.

Objectives:

The present systematic review aims to identify the barriers and facilitators affecting parents’ decisions to vaccinate children aged 5–11 against COVID-19 in Western countries.

Data sources and methods:

The first search was conducted using PsychINFO, MEDLINE and Google Scholar in June 2023 with an additional follow-up search a year later in June 2024 for full-text papers focusing on COVID-19 vaccine decision-making among parents or caregivers of children aged 5–11. The language of the included studies was set as English and originating from Western countries specifically examining barriers and facilitators to COVID-19 vaccination, excluding children with chronic conditions. The risk of bias was independently assessed by both authors using the JBI Checklist for Prevalence Studies, with disagreements resolved through discussion.

Results:

A total of four cross-sectional questionnaire studies involving a total of 5,812 participants from Western countries (the United States and Europe) were included in the present review. Only 46.35% of parents intended to vaccinate their children aged 5–11 against COVID-19. The primary barriers identified were concerns about side effects and distrust in institutions. Key facilitators included recommendations from healthcare professionals and parents’ own COVID-19 vaccination status. Demographic factors including ethnicity and gender showed mixed influence.

Conclusion:

Persistent concerns about side effects and institutional distrust have reduced parental intention to vaccinate their children. However, healthcare professionals play an important role in increasing vaccine uptake through recommendations to their patients. Future interventions should focus on equipping healthcare professionals with the necessary tools to effectively promote vaccination and address parental concerns about side effects.

KeywordsCOVID-19 vaccination; paediatric vaccination; parental decision-making; vaccination barriers; vaccine hesitancy
Year2024
JournalTherapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy
Journal citation12, pp. 1-13
PublisherSAGE Publications
ISSN 2515-1363
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1177/25151355241288115
Web address (URL)https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/25151355241288115
Publisher's version
License
File Access Level
Open
Output statusPublished
Publication dates
Online11 Oct 2024
Publication process dates
Accepted12 Sep 2024
Deposited08 Jan 2025
Permalink -

https://repository.derby.ac.uk/item/qvqz1/covid-19-vaccination-in-children-aged-5-11-a-systematic-review-of-parental-barriers-and-facilitators-in-western-countries

Download files


Publisher's version
Manuscript (TAV).pdf
License: CC BY-NC 4.0
File access level: Open

  • 0
    total views
  • 1
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 1
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Investigating the predictors of COVID-19 vaccine decision-making among parents of children aged 5–11 in the UK
Davey, S. A., Hampson, C., Christodoulaki, M.E. and Gaffiero, D. 2024. Investigating the predictors of COVID-19 vaccine decision-making among parents of children aged 5–11 in the UK. Vaccine. pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.05.069
Parental Vaccine Hesitancy Dataset
Gaffiero, D., Hampson, C. and Davey, S. Parental Vaccine Hesitancy Dataset. University of Derby.
Interpretation Biases in Pain: Validation of Two New Stimulus Sets
Gaffiero, D., Staples, P., Staples, V. and Maratos, F. 2022. Interpretation Biases in Pain: Validation of Two New Stimulus Sets. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.784887
Do individuals with Chronic Pain show attentional bias to pain-related information? An early stage systematic review of the eye-tracking evidence.
Gaffiero, D., Elander, James and Maratos, Frances 2019. Do individuals with Chronic Pain show attentional bias to pain-related information? An early stage systematic review of the eye-tracking evidence. Cognitive Psychology Bulletin.