No plan B: the achilles heel of high performance sport management

Journal article


Bostock, James, Crowther, Phil, Ridley-Duff, Rory and Breese, Richard 2017. No plan B: the achilles heel of high performance sport management. European Sport Management Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2017.1364553
AuthorsBostock, James, Crowther, Phil, Ridley-Duff, Rory and Breese, Richard
Abstract

Research question: The severity and immediacy of funding cuts to UK National Governing Bodies of Sport (NGBs), driven by the ‘No Compromise’ policy framework for Olympic funding, triggers a cyclical need for turnaround management. Adept strategies during times of considerable challenge is stark, yet literature investigating turnaround management within NGBs remains limited. Consequently, this paper examines two questions: how do NGBs respond to UK Sport funding cuts and how are their responses enabled or restricted by their organisational context? Research methods: A case study methodology was used to develop in-depth insights into how three NGBs responded over a 12-month period of turnaround management. This was informed by 21 semistructured interviews with chief executives/presidents, performance managers/head coaches and elite athletes. The actions of the NGBs were analysed through a thematic analysis that made use of Boyne’s [2004. A ‘3Rs’ strategy for public service turnaround: Retrenchment, repositioning and reorganization. Public Money & Management, 24 (2), 97–103] 3 Rs of turnaround strategy. Results and findings: The results highlight that NGBs’ turnaround strategies were constrained by extreme funding dependency and a prohibitive institutional environment that led to states of flux and a focus on short-term operational survival. As a result, the measures taken undermined future success. Implications: An embedded feature of the ‘No Compromise’ framework is severe funding cuts. This should be a significant theme in NGB strategy development. The evidence of this study is that NGBs do not prepare, nor react strategically, when faced with the prospect (or fact of) severe cuts. Consequently, the cases of turnaround management in this study signal the urgent need for further research into the impact of the ‘No Compromise’ framework on the management of NGBs.

Research question: The severity and immediacy of funding cuts to UK National Governing Bodies of Sport (NGBs), driven by the ‘No Compromise’ policy framework for Olympic funding, triggers a cyclical need for turnaround management. Adept strategies during times of considerable challenge is stark, yet literature investigating turnaround management within NGBs remains limited. Consequently, this paper examines two questions: how do NGBs respond to UK Sport funding cuts and how are their responses enabled or restricted by their organisational context?
Research methods: A case study methodology was used to develop in-depth insights into how three NGBs responded over a 12-month period of turnaround management. This was informed by 21 semistructured interviews with chief executives/presidents, performance managers/head coaches and elite athletes. The actions of the NGBs were analysed through a thematic analysis that made use of Boyne’s [2004. A ‘3Rs’ strategy for public service turnaround: Retrenchment, repositioning and reorganization. Public Money & Management, 24 (2), 97–103] 3 Rs of turnaround strategy.
Results and findings: The results highlight that NGBs’ turnaround strategies were constrained by extreme funding dependency and a prohibitive
institutional environment that led to states of flux and a focus on short-term operational survival. As a result, the measures taken undermined future success.
Implications: An embedded feature of the ‘No Compromise’ framework is severe funding cuts. This should be a significant theme in NGB strategy development. The evidence of this study is that NGBs do not prepare, nor react strategically, when faced with the prospect (or fact of) severe cuts. Consequently, the cases of turnaround management in this study signal the urgent need for further research into the impact of the ‘No Compromise’ framework on the management of NGBs.

KeywordsTurnaround; National Governing Bodies; Retrenchment; Repositioning; Reorganisation; Funding
Year2017
JournalEuropean Sport Management Quarterly
PublisherTaylor & Francis
ISSN16184742
1746031X
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2017.1364553
Web address (URL)http://hdl.handle.net/10545/621885
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
hdl:10545/621885
Publication dates21 Sep 2017
Publication process dates
Deposited17 Oct 2017, 14:57
Rights

Archived with thanks to European Sport Management Quarterly

ContributorsUniversity of Derby, Sheffield Hallam University, College of Life and Natural Science, University of Derby, Derbyshire, UK, Sheffield Business School, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK, Sheffield Business School, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK and Sheffield Business School, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
File
File Access Level
Open
File
File Access Level
Open
Permalink -

https://repository.derby.ac.uk/item/9296v/no-plan-b-the-achilles-heel-of-high-performance-sport-management

Download files

  • 42
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 9
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

A Bibliometric Exploration of Events Literature In and Outside the Core Journals
Fletcher, R. and Bostock, J. 2022. A Bibliometric Exploration of Events Literature In and Outside the Core Journals. Event Management. 26 (7), pp. 1607-1622. https://doi.org/10.3727/152599522X16419948391177
Mission vs. Market: Theorizing the Tensions within Community Sport Trusts
Bostock, James, woodward, jon, bull, mike and sibley, jonathan 2021. Mission vs. Market: Theorizing the Tensions within Community Sport Trusts. The International Journal of Sport and Society. https://doi.org/10.18848/2152-7857/CGP/v13i01/1-22
Theorising Organisational Resilience for Sport Management Research and Practice
Bostock, James and Breese, Richard 2021. Theorising Organisational Resilience for Sport Management Research and Practice. Managing Sport and Leisure. https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2021.1930113
Review of survey methods in events management research
Fletcher, Richard and Bostock, James 2019. Review of survey methods in events management research. Event Management.
Challenges for third sector organisations in cutback management: a sporting case study of the implications of publicness.
Bostock, James, Breese, Richard, Crowther, Philip and Ridley-Duff, Rory 2019. Challenges for third sector organisations in cutback management: a sporting case study of the implications of publicness. Public Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1577911
The consequences of ‘no compromise’: Funding elite sport in the UK
Bostock, James 2013. The consequences of ‘no compromise’: Funding elite sport in the UK. in: Inter-Disciplinary Press.
Volunteers in social enterprise events: Triple bottom line benefits
Bostock, James 2014. Volunteers in social enterprise events: Triple bottom line benefits. in: Routledge.
From Beijing to Rio: Funding UK elite sport through the ‘No Compromise’ Policy
Bostock, James 2014. From Beijing to Rio: Funding UK elite sport through the ‘No Compromise’ Policy. in: Inter-Disciplinary Press.
A stakeholder centric approach
Bostock, James 2014. A stakeholder centric approach. in: Goodfellows.
Event management research: A consensus of experience
Bostock, James, Crowther, Phil and Perry, John 2015. Event management research: A consensus of experience. in: Leisure Studies Association.
Rising to the challenge of sustainability - Community events by the community, for the community
Bostock, James, Cooper, Richard and Roberts, Gareth 2015. Rising to the challenge of sustainability - Community events by the community, for the community. in: Palgrave Macmillan.
Review of established methods in event research
Crowther, Phil, Bostock, James and Perry, John 2015. Review of established methods in event research. Event Management. https://doi.org/10.3727/152599515X14229071393061