Complex interventions - Exploring the application of behaviour change theory to doctoral supervisor training.

Conference Presentation


Lipka, Sigrid 2018. Complex interventions - Exploring the application of behaviour change theory to doctoral supervisor training.
AuthorsLipka, Sigrid
TypeConference Presentation
Abstract

Rationale: The student-supervisor relationship is an important factor impacting on doctoral student satisfaction and successful completion rates (e.g., Hodsdon & Buckley 2011; Kulej & Park 2008). Good supervision affects the student experience, student wellbeing and happiness (e.g., Cowling, 2017). Given the complex nature of effective supervision and the many specific behaviours it consists of (e.g., Debowski, 2016; Hyatt, 2017; Lee, 2008; Peelo, 2011), a key question is whether desired supervisory behaviours can be created by staff development trainings. Aims: The Com-B model (e.g., Michie et al. 2011) was used as a framework with the aim to i) define capabilities, opportunities and motivations that underpin supervisor behaviours towards their doctoral students, ii) design a research supervisor training programme and iii) develop criteria for measuring and evaluating the effectiveness of such trainings. Methodology: The Com-B framework has been tested over a period of seven years by applying it to the development, implementation and evaluation of a supervisor development training at a UK university. The training, delivered by a team of experienced researchers and supervisors, is aimed at academics new to the role of doctoral supervisor. It was designed to build new supervisors’ practical skills, knowledge of regulatory requirements and critical awareness of pedagogical literature required to engage in effective supervisory behaviour. The training consists of three, three-hour long sessions spread over three months. Questionnaires were handed out to 87 new supervisors from a range of subject areas and types of doctoral degree at the end of their training programme. 61 staff (70%) returned completed questionnaires. The questionnaire consisted of open-ended questions about participants’ motivations to do the training, confidence in newly learned skills and knowledge, most useful aspects of the training received and areas for further training. Analysis: Responses were analysed thematically and frequencies of common types of responses were compared. Results: The great majority of supervisors reported an increase in their knowledge, capabilities and confidence as a result of the training, whilst a minority expressed a desire for more exposure to actual supervisory practice as part of the training. Many candidates mentioned exchange and discussion with colleagues from different subject areas as useful and motivational. Only very few specific suggestions for what else to include in the training were made, asking for more opportunities aimed at bridging a perceived knowledge-practice gap. Conclusions: The findings suggest that the behaviour change framework provides a promising strategy for creating, implementing and evaluating doctoral supervisor trainings. Desired supervisory behaviours can be created by improving staff capabilities (their knowledge, skills) and confidence through training, in line with previous research (e.g., Kiley, 2011; McCulloch & Loeser, 2016; Peelo, 2011). Future interventions need to include further activities to bridge the practice-knowledge gap experienced by new supervisors, and extend discussion with a fuller range of stakeholders. Future research should establish the long-term effects of supervisory training on supervisory behaviours and investigate how opportunities provided by institutional and wider contexts affect supervisor behaviour and the health and wellbeing of doctoral students throughout their doctoral journey.

Rationale: The student-supervisor relationship is an important factor impacting on doctoral student satisfaction and successful completion rates (e.g., Hodsdon & Buckley 2011; Kulej & Park 2008). Good supervision affects the student experience, student wellbeing and happiness (e.g., Cowling, 2017). Given the complex nature of effective supervision and the many specific behaviours it consists of (e.g., Debowski, 2016; Hyatt, 2017; Lee, 2008; Peelo, 2011), a key question is whether desired supervisory behaviours can be created by staff development trainings.
Aims: The Com-B model (e.g., Michie et al. 2011) was used as a framework with the aim to i) define capabilities, opportunities and motivations that underpin supervisor behaviours towards their doctoral students, ii) design a research supervisor training programme and iii) develop criteria for measuring and evaluating the effectiveness of such trainings.
Methodology: The Com-B framework has been tested over a period of seven years by applying it to the development, implementation and evaluation of a supervisor development training at a UK university. The training, delivered by a team of experienced researchers and supervisors, is aimed at academics new to the role of doctoral supervisor. It was designed to build new supervisors’ practical skills, knowledge of regulatory requirements and critical awareness of pedagogical literature required to engage in effective supervisory behaviour. The training consists of three, three-hour long sessions spread over three months. Questionnaires were handed out to 87 new supervisors from a range of subject areas and types of doctoral degree at the end of their training programme. 61 staff (70%) returned completed questionnaires. The questionnaire consisted of open-ended questions about participants’ motivations to do the training, confidence in newly learned skills and knowledge, most useful aspects of the training received and areas for further training.
Analysis: Responses were analysed thematically and frequencies of common types of responses were compared.
Results: The great majority of supervisors reported an increase in their knowledge, capabilities and confidence as a result of the training, whilst a minority expressed a desire for more exposure to actual supervisory practice as part of the training. Many candidates mentioned exchange and discussion with colleagues from different subject areas as useful and motivational. Only very few specific suggestions for what else to include in the training were made, asking for more opportunities aimed at bridging a perceived knowledge-practice gap.
Conclusions: The findings suggest that the behaviour change framework provides a promising strategy for creating, implementing and evaluating doctoral supervisor trainings. Desired supervisory behaviours can be created by improving staff capabilities (their knowledge, skills) and confidence through training, in line with previous research (e.g., Kiley, 2011; McCulloch & Loeser, 2016; Peelo, 2011). Future interventions need to include further activities to bridge the practice-knowledge gap experienced by new supervisors, and extend discussion with a fuller range of stakeholders. Future research should establish the long-term effects of supervisory training on supervisory behaviours and investigate how opportunities provided by institutional and wider contexts affect supervisor behaviour and the health and wellbeing of doctoral students throughout their doctoral journey.

KeywordsPedagogy; Evaluation; Behaviour change; Complex interventions; Doctoral supervision; Doctoral students
Year2018
Web address (URL)http://hdl.handle.net/10545/622330
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/
hdl:10545/622330
File
File Access Level
Open
File
File Access Level
Open
File
File Access Level
Open
Publication dates22 Feb 2018
Publication process dates
Deposited15 Mar 2018, 16:10
ContributorsUniversity of Derby
Permalink -

https://repository.derby.ac.uk/item/93v1z/complex-interventions-exploring-the-application-of-behaviour-change-theory-to-doctoral-supervisor-training

Download files


File
license_url
File access level: Open

license.txt
File access level: Open

  • 57
    total views
  • 67
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Application of theoretical domains framework to explore the enablers and barriers to physical activity among university staff and students: a qualitative study
Ndupu, L., Staples, V., Lipka, S., Faghy, M., Bessadet, N and Bussell, C. 2023. Application of theoretical domains framework to explore the enablers and barriers to physical activity among university staff and students: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 23 (670), pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15588-w
Exploring the predictors of physical inactivity in a university setting
Ndupu, L.B., Bussell, C., Faghy, M., Staples, V. and Lipka, S. 2023. Exploring the predictors of physical inactivity in a university setting. BMC Public Health. 23 (59). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14953-5
Exploring pattern recognition: what is the relationship between the recognition of words, faces and other objects?
Maratos, F., Chu, K., Lipka, S., Parente, F. and Stupple, E. 2022. Exploring pattern recognition: what is the relationship between the recognition of words, faces and other objects? Cognitive Processing. 24, pp. 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-022-01111-3
The impact of pop-up warning messages of losses on expenditure in a simulated game of roulette: A pilot Study
McGivern, Paul, Hussain, Zaheer, Lipka, Sigrid and Stupple, Edward 2019. The impact of pop-up warning messages of losses on expenditure in a simulated game of roulette: A pilot Study. BMC Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7191-5
Development programmes for new doctoral supervisors – do they work?
Lipka, Sigrid 2017. Development programmes for new doctoral supervisors – do they work?
Development programmes for new doctoral supervisors – do they work?
Lipka, Sigrid 2017. Development programmes for new doctoral supervisors – do they work?
Three insights gained – Delivering doctoral supervision training
Lipka, Sigrid 2017. Three insights gained – Delivering doctoral supervision training.
Effects of time pressure and maths anxiety on solving mental arithmetic problems
Lipka, Sigrid and Clarke, Lauren 2014. Effects of time pressure and maths anxiety on solving mental arithmetic problems. British Psychological Society.
The effects of anxiety on temporal attention for emotive and neutral faces in children
Kelly, Lauren, Maratos, Frances A. and Lipka, Sigrid 2014. The effects of anxiety on temporal attention for emotive and neutral faces in children. Stress and Anxiety Research Society (STAR).
Attentional bias towards threatening and neutral facial expressions in high trait anxious children.
Kelly, Lauren, Maratos, Frances A., Lipka, Sigrid and Croker, Steve 2016. Attentional bias towards threatening and neutral facial expressions in high trait anxious children. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology. https://doi.org/10.5127/jep.052915
Facial expressions depicting compassionate and critical emotions: the development and validation of a new emotional face stimulus set
McEwan, Kirsten, Gilbert, Paul, Dandeneau, Stephane, Lipka, Sigrid, Maratos, Frances A., Paterson, Kevin B. and Baldwin, Mark 2014. Facial expressions depicting compassionate and critical emotions: the development and validation of a new emotional face stimulus set. PLos ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088783
Neural networks engaged in short-term memory rehearsal are disrupted by irrelevant speech in human subjects
Kopp, Franziska, Schröger, Erich and Lipka, Sigrid 2004. Neural networks engaged in short-term memory rehearsal are disrupted by irrelevant speech in human subjects. Neuroscience Letters.
Synchronized brain activity during rehearsal and short-term memory disruption by irrelevant speech is affected by recall mode
Kopp, Franziska, Schröger, Erich and Lipka, Sigrid 2013. Synchronized brain activity during rehearsal and short-term memory disruption by irrelevant speech is affected by recall mode. International Journal of Psychophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.10.001
Reading sentences with a late closure ambiguity: does semantic information help?
Lipka, Sigrid 2002. Reading sentences with a late closure ambiguity: does semantic information help? Language and Cognitive Processes. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960143000029
Implicit alcohol-aggression scripts and alcohol-related aggression on a laboratory task in 11- to 14-year-old adolescents
Brown, Stephen L., Lipka, Sigrid, Coyne, Sarah M., Qualter, Pamela, Barlow, Alexandra and Taylor, Paul 2013. Implicit alcohol-aggression scripts and alcohol-related aggression on a laboratory task in 11- to 14-year-old adolescents. Aggressive Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20400
The effect of cognitive load on faking interrogative suggestibility on the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale
Drake, Kim E., Lipka, Sigrid, Smith, Charlotte and Egan, Vincent 2013. The effect of cognitive load on faking interrogative suggestibility on the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale. Personality and Individual Differences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.12.011
Impact of chronic somatoform and osteoarthritis pain on conscious and preconscious cognitive processing
Dohrenbusch, Ralf, Buchanan, Heather, Lipka, Sigrid and Ott, Ralf 2013. Impact of chronic somatoform and osteoarthritis pain on conscious and preconscious cognitive processing. Journal of Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2008.05.004