Fingermark Quality, A Survey of Examiners and Researchers

Journal article


Hanna, T., Moret, S. and Chadwick, S. 2024. Fingermark Quality, A Survey of Examiners and Researchers. Forensic Science International. 361, pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112100
AuthorsHanna, T., Moret, S. and Chadwick, S.
Abstract

The primary aim of fingermark research is to advance the quantity and quality of fingermarks detected using novel techniques or improvements on existing methods. Subsequently, there is a need to evaluate these methods to determine the quality of the developed mark, which is mostly done by the use of a numerical scale with descriptors to assist in the evaluation. However, this evaluation is often complicated due to a wide range of variables that impact the way quality assessment is performed. This is particularly true when considering it is currently unknown what assessment parameters are required to encompass the overall definition of quality. Likewise, the definition of fingermark quality is not universally agreed upon, which leads to significant subjective interpretation when a researcher chooses a scale. The purpose of this study was to investigate the factors contributing to fingermark quality in order to generate a deeper understanding of current approaches and definitions. A survey was created through a dataset that consisted of over 500 fingermarks detected in controlled laboratory conditions with a range of techniques. The images selected for the survey were based upon representing a full range of quality, each with a varying range of attributes. The survey looked at different parameters and descriptions used in current assessment protocols, asked participants to grade marks based on chosen parameters, and investigated current chosen methods by researchers in fingermark definition. The survey relied upon the participation of both examiners and researchers in fingermark detection. The results indicate that quality assessment methods implemented by researchers are not utilising all parameters that fingermark researchers and examiners deem important. This is especially true for contrast and background development, considered as two of the top parameters by examiners and researchers, which are not regularly used in most quality scale assessment methods. The survey ultimately demonstrated that the current subjective quality assessment methods were not always suitable and highlighted more appropriate parameters and descriptors that should be considered when assessing the quality of a fingermark.

KeywordsQuality metrics; Subjective scales; Fingermark quality parameters
Year2024
JournalForensic Science International
Journal citation361, pp. 1-12
PublisherElsevier
ISSN0379-0738
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112100
Web address (URL)https://www-sciencedirect-com.derby.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S0379073824001816
Publisher's version
License
File Access Level
Open
Output statusPublished
Publication dates
Online08 Jun 2024
Publication process dates
Accepted07 Jun 2024
Deposited26 Jul 2024
Permalink -

https://repository.derby.ac.uk/item/q74xy/fingermark-quality-a-survey-of-examiners-and-researchers

Download files


Publisher's version
1-s2.0-S0379073824001816-main.pdf
License: CC BY 4.0
File access level: Open

  • 18
    total views
  • 10
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Illuminating the dark web market of fraudulent identity documents and personal information: An international and Australian perspective
Devlin, C., Chadwick, S., Moret, S., Baechler, S., Rossy, Q. and Morelato, M. 2024. Illuminating the dark web market of fraudulent identity documents and personal information: An international and Australian perspective. Forensic Science International. 363, pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/1016/j.forsciint.2024.112203
An investigation into the effect of surfactants on iron oxide powder suspension formulations for fingermark development
Ree, L.C., de la Hunty, M., Moret, S. and Chadwick, S. 2024. An investigation into the effect of surfactants on iron oxide powder suspension formulations for fingermark development. Forensic Science International. 358, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112019
Production of artificial fingermarks. Part II – The use of a modified inkjet printer for the deposition of synthetic secretions
Steiner, R., Moret, S. and Roux, C. 2023. Production of artificial fingermarks. Part II – The use of a modified inkjet printer for the deposition of synthetic secretions. Forensic Science International. 350, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111804
Comparison of carbon and iron oxide based powder suspension formulations
Clover Ree, L., Chadwick, S. and Moret, S. 2023. Comparison of carbon and iron oxide based powder suspension formulations. Forensic Science International. 347, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111685
Fingermark quality assessment, a transversal study of subjective quality scales
Hanna, Teneil, Chadwick, Scott and Moret, S. 2023. Fingermark quality assessment, a transversal study of subjective quality scales. Forensic Science International. 350, pp. 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111783
Biodegradable plastics and their impact on fingermark detection methods
Harrison Woodward, Moret, S. and Scott Chadwick 2023. Biodegradable plastics and their impact on fingermark detection methods. Forensic Science International. Vol 344 (March 2023, Article: 111571). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111571
The potential of using the forensic profiles of Australian fraudulent identity documents to assist intelligence-led policing
Ciara Devlin, Scott Chadwick, Sebastien Moret, Simon Baechler, Jennifer Raymond and Marie Morelato 2022. The potential of using the forensic profiles of Australian fraudulent identity documents to assist intelligence-led policing. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2022.2074138
Production of artificial fingermarks. Part I – Synthetic secretions formulation
Steiner, R., Roux, C. and Moret, S. 2022. Production of artificial fingermarks. Part I – Synthetic secretions formulation. Forensic Science International. Vol 331 (February 2022, 111166). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.111166
Latent fingermark detection using functionalised silicon oxide nanoparticles: Investigation into novel application procedures
Lee, T., Kanodarwala, F.K., Lennard, C., Spindler, X., Spikmans, V., Roux, C. and Moret, S. 2022. Latent fingermark detection using functionalised silicon oxide nanoparticles: Investigation into novel application procedures. Forensic Science International. Vol 335 (Article: 111275). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111275
Comparison of NIR powders to conventional fingerprint powders
Chadwick, S., Cvetanovski, M., Ross, M., Sharp, A. and Moret, S. 2021. Comparison of NIR powders to conventional fingerprint powders. Forensic Science International. Vol 328 (November 2021, Article: 111023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.111023
Fingermark detection using upconverting nanoparticles and comparison with cyanoacrylate fuming
Kanodarwala, F.K., Leśniewski, A., Olszowska-Łoś, I., Spindler, X., Pieta, I.S., Lennard, C., Niedziółka-Jönsson, J., Moret, S. and Roux, C. 2021. Fingermark detection using upconverting nanoparticles and comparison with cyanoacrylate fuming. Forensic Science International. Vol 326 (Article 110915). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110915
Novel upconverting nanoparticles for fingermark detection
Fehmida K. Kanodarwala, Moret, S., Xanthe Spindler, Chris Lennard and Claude Roux 2020. Novel upconverting nanoparticles for fingermark detection. Optical Materials. Vol 111 (January 2021, 110568). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2020.110568
Evaluation of the use of chemical pads to mimic latent fingermarks for research purposes
Romain Steiner, Moret, S. and Claude Roux 2020. Evaluation of the use of chemical pads to mimic latent fingermarks for research purposes. Forensic Science International. Vol 314 (September 2020, 110411). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110411
Latent fingermark detection using functionalised silicon oxide nanoparticles: Optimisation and comparison with cyanoacrylate fuming
Lee, T., Fehmida K. Kanodarwala, Chris Lennard, Xanthe Spindler, Val Spikmans, Claude Roux and Moret, S. 2020. Latent fingermark detection using functionalised silicon oxide nanoparticles: Optimisation and comparison with cyanoacrylate fuming. Forensic Science International. Volume 315 (October 2020, 110442). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110442
Nanoparticles used for fingermark detection—A comprehensive review
Fehmida K. Kanodarwala, Moret, S., Xanthe Spindler, Chris Lennard and Claude Roux 2019. Nanoparticles used for fingermark detection—A comprehensive review. WIREs Forensic Science. Vol 1 (Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.1002/wfs2.1341
Controlling fingermark variability for research purposes: A review
Romain Steiner, Claude Roux and Sebastien Moret 2019. Controlling fingermark variability for research purposes: A review. WIREs Forensic Science. Vol 1 (Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1002/wfs2.1338
Potential application of liquid dye penetrants for serial number restoration on firearms
Philip Maynard, Kyle Skinner, Matthew Bolton and Moret, S. 2019. Potential application of liquid dye penetrants for serial number restoration on firearms. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences. Vol 51 (Issue 6), pp. 674-684. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2018.1450894
Paper characteristics and their influence on the ability of Single Metal Deposition to detect fingermarks
Ouahiba Acherar, Minh Quang Truong, Sylvain Robert, Frank Crispino, Moret, S. and Andy Bécue 2019. Paper characteristics and their influence on the ability of Single Metal Deposition to detect fingermarks. Forensic Chemistry. Vol 12 (March 2019), pp. 8-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forc.2018.11.005
Single metal deposition versus physical developer: A comparison between two advanced fingermark detection techniques
Moret, S., Lee, T., Mackenzie de la Hunty, Xanthe Spindler, Chris Lennard and Claude Roux 2019. Single metal deposition versus physical developer: A comparison between two advanced fingermark detection techniques. Forensic Science International. Vol 294 (January 2019), pp. 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.10.032
Latent fingermark detection using functionalised silicon oxide nanoparticles: Method optimisation and evaluation
Lee, T., Fehmida K. Kanodarwala, Chris Lennard, Xanthe Spindler, Val Spikmans, Claude Roux and Moret, S. 2019. Latent fingermark detection using functionalised silicon oxide nanoparticles: Method optimisation and evaluation. Forensic Science International. Vol 298 (May 2019), pp. 372-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.02.038
The frequency of fingerprint patterns separated by ethnicity and sex in a general population from Sydney, Australia
Andrew Walton, Sebastien Moret, Mark Barash and Peter Gunn 2019. The frequency of fingerprint patterns separated by ethnicity and sex in a general population from Sydney, Australia. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences. Vol 51 (Supplement 1), pp. S162-S167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2019.1569153
Dataset of coded handwriting features for use in statistical modelling
Agius, A., Morelato, M., Moret, S., Chadwick, S., Jones, K., Epple, R., Brown, J. and Roux, C. 2018. Dataset of coded handwriting features for use in statistical modelling. Data in Brief. Vol 16 (February 2018), pp. 1010 - 1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2017.12.014
An effective Physical Developer (PD) method for use in Australian laboratories
de la Hunty, M., Moret, S., Chadwick, S., Lennard, C., Spindler, X. and Roux, C. 2018. An effective Physical Developer (PD) method for use in Australian laboratories. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences. Vol 50 (Issue 6, 2 November 2018), pp. 666 - 671. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2018.1424243
Metal-Organic Frameworks for fingermark detection — A feasibility study
Moret, S., Esther Scott, Adrian Barone, Kang Liang, Chris Lennard, Claude Roux and Xanthe Spindler 2018. Metal-Organic Frameworks for fingermark detection — A feasibility study. Forensic Science International. Vol 291 (October 2018), pp. 83 - 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.08.005
Impact of one-step luminescent cyanoacrylate treatment on subsequent DNA analysis
Alicia Khuu, Scott Chadwick, Moret, S., Xanthe Spindler, Peter Gunn and Claude Roux 2018. Impact of one-step luminescent cyanoacrylate treatment on subsequent DNA analysis. Forensic Science International. Vol 286 (May2018), pp. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.02.015
Using handwriting to infer a writer’s country of origin for forensic intelligence purposes
Anna Agius, Marie Morelato, Moret, S., Scott Chadwick, Kylie Jones, Rochelle Epple, James Brown and Claude Roux 2018. Using handwriting to infer a writer’s country of origin for forensic intelligence purposes. Forensic Science International. Vol 282 (January 2018), pp. 144 - 156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.11.028
Investigation of some of the factors influencing fingermark detection
Scott Chadwick, Sebastien Moret, Nilesh Jayashanka, Chris Lennard, Xanthe Spindler and Claude Roux 2018. Investigation of some of the factors influencing fingermark detection. Forensic Science International. Vol 289 (August 2018), pp. 381 - 389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.06.014
Comment on “Linkage analysis of a model quantitative trait in humans: Finger ridge count shows significant multivariate linkage to 5q14.1” by Medland et al., “Common Genetic Variants Influence Whorls in Fingerprint Patterns” by Ho et al. and “Hot on the Trail of Genes that Shape Our Fingerprints” by Walsh et al .
Andrew D. Walton, Sebastien Moret, Peter Gunn and Mark Barash 2018. Comment on “Linkage analysis of a model quantitative trait in humans: Finger ridge count shows significant multivariate linkage to 5q14.1” by Medland et al., “Common Genetic Variants Influence Whorls in Fingerprint Patterns” by Ho et al. and “Hot on the Trail of Genes that Shape Our Fingerprints” by Walsh et al . Forensic Science International: Genetics. Vol 36 (September 2018), pp. e14-e16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.06.010
Forensic Science: Current State and Perspective by a Group of Early Career Researchers
Morelato, M., Barash, M., Blanes, L., Chadwick, S., Dilag, J., Kuzhiumparambil, U., Nizio, K.D., Spindler, X. and Moret, S. 2017. Forensic Science: Current State and Perspective by a Group of Early Career Researchers. Foundations of Science. Vol 22 (Issue 4), pp. 799 - 825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-016-9500-0
The use of handwriting examinations beyond the traditional court purpose
Anna Agius, Kylie Jones, Rochelle Epple, Marie Morelato, Moret, S., Scott Chadwick and Claude Roux 2017. The use of handwriting examinations beyond the traditional court purpose. Science & Justice. Vol 57 (Issue 5, September 2017), pp. 394-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2017.05.001
Evaluation of one-step luminescent cyanoacrylate fuming
Alicia Khuu, Scott Chadwick, Xanthe Spindler, Rolanda Lam, Moret, S. and Claude Roux 2016. Evaluation of one-step luminescent cyanoacrylate fuming. Forensic Science International. Vol 263 (June 2016), pp. 126-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.04.007
Can contamination occur in body bags? The example of background fibres in body bags used in Australia
Giuliana Schwendener, Moret, S., Karen Cavanagh-Steer and Claude Roux 2016. Can contamination occur in body bags? The example of background fibres in body bags used in Australia. Forensic Science International. Vol 266 (September 2016), pp. 517-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.07.012
Authors’ response to comments on “Evaluation of one-step luminescent cyanoacrylate fuming”
Khuu, A., Chadwick, S., Spindler, X., Lam, R., Moret, S. and Roux, C. 2016. Authors’ response to comments on “Evaluation of one-step luminescent cyanoacrylate fuming”. Forensic Science International. Vol 268 (November 2016), pp. e25-e26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.09.016
Functionalised silicon oxide nanoparticles for fingermark detection
Moret, S., Andy Bécue and Christophe Champod 2016. Functionalised silicon oxide nanoparticles for fingermark detection. Forensic Science International. Vol 259 (February 2016), pp. 10-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.11.015
Further investigations into the single metal deposition (SMD II) technique for the detection of latent fingermarks
Newland, T.G., Moret, S., Bécue, A. and Lewis, S.W. 2016. Further investigations into the single metal deposition (SMD II) technique for the detection of latent fingermarks. Forensic Science International. Vol 268 (1 November 2016), pp. Pages 62 - 72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.09.004
Understanding physical developer (PD): Part I – Is PD targeting lipids?
Mackenzie de la Hunty, Moret, S., Scott Chadwick, Chris Lennard, Xanthe Spindler and Claude Roux 2015. Understanding physical developer (PD): Part I – Is PD targeting lipids? Forensic Science International. Vol 257 (December 2015), pp. 481-487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.06.034
Microscopic examination of fingermark residues: Opportunities for fundamental studies
Moret, S., Spindler, X., Lennard, C. and Roux, C. 2015. Microscopic examination of fingermark residues: Opportunities for fundamental studies. Forensic Science International. Vol 255, (October 2015), pp. 28-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.05.027
Understanding Physical Developer (PD): Part II - Is PD targeting eccrine constituents?
de la Hunty, M., Moret, S., Chadwick, S., Lennard, C., Spindler, X. and Roux, C. 2015. Understanding Physical Developer (PD): Part II - Is PD targeting eccrine constituents? Forensic Science International. Vol 257 (December 2015), pp. 488-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.08.029
Single-Metal deposition for Fingermark detection - A simpler and more efficient protocol
Moret, S. and Bécue, A. 2015. Single-Metal deposition for Fingermark detection - A simpler and more efficient protocol. Journal of Forensic Identification. Vol 65 (Issue 2, 1 March 2015), pp. 118 - 137.
Fingermark detection on thermal papers: Proposition of an updated processing sequence
Fitzi, T., Fischer, R., Moret, S. and Bécue, A. 2014. Fingermark detection on thermal papers: Proposition of an updated processing sequence. Journal of Forensic Identification. Vol 64 (Issue 4), pp. 329 - 350.
Nanoparticles for fingermark detection: An insight into the reaction mechanism
Moret, S., Bécue, A. and Champod, C. 2014. Nanoparticles for fingermark detection: An insight into the reaction mechanism. Nanotechnology. Vol 25, (Issue 42, Article: 425502). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/25/42/425502