Understanding the evaluation of access and participation outreach interventions for under 16 year olds.

Report


Harrison, Neil, Vigurs, Katy, Crockford, Julian, McCaig Colin, Squire, Ruth and Clark, Lewis 2018. Understanding the evaluation of access and participation outreach interventions for under 16 year olds. Office for Students.
AuthorsHarrison, Neil, Vigurs, Katy, Crockford, Julian, McCaig Colin, Squire, Ruth and Clark, Lewis
Abstract

The project team was asked to address the following six research questions and these were used to guide the project: 1. What are the intended outcomes for current outreach interventions directed at under 16 year olds from disadvantaged backgrounds where the long-term aim is to widen access to higher education (HE)? 2. What types of outreach intervention activity or activities are institutions using in relation to intended outcomes? 3. What evaluation tools, methods and metrics are being used to measure the intended outcomes? 4. What are the perceived and actual challenges and barriers for different stakeholders to effective evaluation of long-term outreach? 5. What do different stakeholders consider most effective evaluation practice and why? 6. How valid and suitable are the evaluation tools, methods and metrics (identified through the research) that are commonly used? The project was constructed around six interlinked work packages: 1. A quantitative analysis of what higher education providers (HEPs) say about their pre-16 outreach activities (and their evaluation) in their 2017-18 access agreements (as the most recent available). 2. An online survey of HEPs to gather information about the pre-16 outreach activities delivered during the 2016-17 academic year and their evaluation, as well as the structure of their evaluation resources and challenges faced. 3. Case studies of four HEPs identified as demonstrating elements of good practice through their access agreements and the online survey, derived from telephone interviews with key staff and documentary analysis. 4. Telephone interviews with 11 third sector organisations (TSOs) to explore their practices and the evaluation of their activities, providing a counterpoint to the data collected from higher education institutions (HEIs). 5. A synthesis of the four preceding work packages to explore elements of good practice, determine a basis for assessing the quality of evaluations and highlight challenges for the sector and OFFA. 6. An invited participatory workshop for evaluators from HEPs and TSOs identified as demonstrating elements of good practice through the online survey and telephone interviews, to act as a sounding board for the emerging conclusions and recommendations.

The project team was asked to address the following six research questions and these were
used to guide the project:
1. What are the intended outcomes for current outreach interventions directed at under
16 year olds from disadvantaged backgrounds where the long-term aim is to widen
access to higher education (HE)?
2. What types of outreach intervention activity or activities are institutions using in
relation to intended outcomes?
3. What evaluation tools, methods and metrics are being used to measure the intended
outcomes?
4. What are the perceived and actual challenges and barriers for different stakeholders
to effective evaluation of long-term outreach?
5. What do different stakeholders consider most effective evaluation practice and why?
6. How valid and suitable are the evaluation tools, methods and metrics (identified
through the research) that are commonly used?
The project was constructed around six interlinked work packages:
1. A quantitative analysis of what higher education providers (HEPs) say about their
pre-16 outreach activities (and their evaluation) in their 2017-18 access agreements
(as the most recent available).
2. An online survey of HEPs to gather information about the pre-16 outreach activities
delivered during the 2016-17 academic year and their evaluation, as well as the
structure of their evaluation resources and challenges faced.
3. Case studies of four HEPs identified as demonstrating elements of good practice
through their access agreements and the online survey, derived from telephone
interviews with key staff and documentary analysis.
4. Telephone interviews with 11 third sector organisations (TSOs) to explore their
practices and the evaluation of their activities, providing a counterpoint to the data
collected from higher education institutions (HEIs).
5. A synthesis of the four preceding work packages to explore elements of good
practice, determine a basis for assessing the quality of evaluations and highlight
challenges for the sector and OFFA.
6. An invited participatory workshop for evaluators from HEPs and TSOs identified as
demonstrating elements of good practice through the online survey and telephone interviews, to act as a sounding board for the emerging conclusions and recommendations.

KeywordsWidening participation; Outreach; Evaluation; Higher education
Year2018
PublisherOffice for Students
Web address (URL)http://hdl.handle.net/10545/623225
hdl:10545/623225
File
File Access Level
Open
File
File Access Level
Open
Publication dates13 Dec 2018
Publication process dates
Deposited14 Dec 2018, 15:48
ContributorsUniversity of the West of England, University of Derby, University of Sheffield and Sheffield Hallam University
Permalink -

https://repository.derby.ac.uk/item/936xx/understanding-the-evaluation-of-access-and-participation-outreach-interventions-for-under-16-year-olds

Download files

  • 18
    total views
  • 2
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Exploring students’ and graduates’ attitudes to the process of transition to the labour market
Hooley, T., Hanson, J. and Clark, L. 2022. Exploring students’ and graduates’ attitudes to the process of transition to the labour market. Industry and Higher Education. pp. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222221111298
The importance of an inclusive alumni network for ensuring effective transitions into employment and future destinations for people with learning disabilities
Blake, Hannah, Hanson, Jill and Clark, Lewis 2021. The importance of an inclusive alumni network for ensuring effective transitions into employment and future destinations for people with learning disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities. https://doi.org/10.1111/bld.12429
Understanding parents’ contribution to young people’s career decision-making
Clark, Lewis and Moore, Nicki 2021. Understanding parents’ contribution to young people’s career decision-making. Career Matters.
A Practitioner's Guide to Uncharted Waters of Career Counselling, a Critical Reflection Perspective
Košťálová, Helena, Cudlínová, Markéta, Blake, Hannah, Clark, Lewis, Dimsits, Miriam, Kavková, Eva, Graungaard, Elisabeth, Moore, Nicki, Sigaard Hansen, Jesper, Neary, S., Nemcova, Lenka, Nogueira Perez, Miguel Angel, Fernandez Rey, Elena and Ceinos Sanz, Cristina 2021. A Practitioner's Guide to Uncharted Waters of Career Counselling, a Critical Reflection Perspective. EKS.
Crucial impacts on career choices: Research to understand the influences on young people’s choices in primary and secondary schools: Final report
Moore, Nicki, Neary, S., Clark, Lewis and Blake, Hannah 2021. Crucial impacts on career choices: Research to understand the influences on young people’s choices in primary and secondary schools: Final report. University of Derby.
Crucial impacts on career choices: Research to understand the influences on young people’s choices in primary and secondary schools: Executive summary
Moore, Nicki, Clark, Lewis, Neary, S. and Blake, Hannah 2021. Crucial impacts on career choices: Research to understand the influences on young people’s choices in primary and secondary schools: Executive summary. University of Derby.
An evaluation of the North East of England pilot of the Gatsby Benchmarks of good career guidance
Hanson, Jill, Moore, Nicki, Neary, S. and Clark, Lewis 2021. An evaluation of the North East of England pilot of the Gatsby Benchmarks of good career guidance. University of Derby.
Future frontiers: the impact of career coaching on year 11 students
Hanson, Jill and Clark, Lewis 2020. Future frontiers: the impact of career coaching on year 11 students. IAEVG.
An evaluation of the INSPiRED teenager framework
Clark, Lewis and Parry, Caroline 2019. An evaluation of the INSPiRED teenager framework. Journal of the National Institute for Career Education and Counselling. https://doi.org/10.20856/jnicec.4307
An evaluation of the Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire collaborative outreach programme
Hanson, Jill and Clark, Lewis 2019. An evaluation of the Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire collaborative outreach programme. University of Derby.
International Centre for Guidance Studies (iCeGS) Annual Review (2020)
Neary, S., Hanson, Jill, Moore, Nicki, Staunton, Tom, Clark, Lewis and Blake, Hannah 2020. International Centre for Guidance Studies (iCeGS) Annual Review (2020). University of Derby.
Future Frontiers: The impact of career coaching on career readiness and indicators of successful transitions in Year 11 pupils.
Hanson, Jill and Clark, Lewis 2019. Future Frontiers: The impact of career coaching on career readiness and indicators of successful transitions in Year 11 pupils. Future Frontiers.
Evaluation of the INSPiRED teenager programme
Clark, Lewis 2019. Evaluation of the INSPiRED teenager programme. University of Derby.
Gatsby careers benchmark north east implementation pilot: interim evaluation (2015-2017)
Hanson, Jill, Vigurs, Katy, Moore, Nicki, Everitt, Julia and Clark, Lewis 2019. Gatsby careers benchmark north east implementation pilot: interim evaluation (2015-2017).
Exorcising an ethnography in limbo.
Vigurs, Katy 2019. Exorcising an ethnography in limbo. in: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Supporting service children in school: An organisational improvement framework
Burke, Ciaran, Neary, S., Hanson, Jill, Parker, Gordon, Everitt, Julia and Clark, Lewis 2019. Supporting service children in school: An organisational improvement framework. University of Derby.
International centre for guidance studies (iCeGS) annual review 2019
Neary, S., Clark, Lewis, Hanson, Jill, Nicki, Moore and Tom, Staunton 2019. International centre for guidance studies (iCeGS) annual review 2019.
Evaluation of outreach interventions for under 16 year olds: Tools and guidance for higher education providers.
Harrison, Neil, Vigurs, Katy, Crockford, Julian, McCaig Colin, Squire, Ruth and Clark, Lewis 2018. Evaluation of outreach interventions for under 16 year olds: Tools and guidance for higher education providers. Office for Students (OfS).
Mindful networks? Navigating and negotiating life and work in academia.
Vigurs, Katy 2018. Mindful networks? Navigating and negotiating life and work in academia. in: Springer.
Graduate gap years: Narratives of postponement in graduate employment transitions in England.
Vigurs, Katy, Jones, Steven, Harris, Diane and Everitt, Julia 2018. Graduate gap years: Narratives of postponement in graduate employment transitions in England. in: Routledge.
Using Twitter to tackle peripherality? Facilitating networked scholarship for part-time doctoral students within and beyond the university
Vigurs, Katy 2016. Using Twitter to tackle peripherality? Facilitating networked scholarship for part-time doctoral students within and beyond the university. Fusion Journal.
Higher fees, higher debts: Greater expectations of graduate futures? A research-informed comic.
Vigurs, Katy, Jones, Steven and Harris, Diane 2016. Higher fees, higher debts: Greater expectations of graduate futures? A research-informed comic. Society for Research into Higher Education.
Greater expectations of graduate futures? A comparative analysis of the views of the last generation of lower-fees undergraduates and the first generation of higher-fees undergraduates at two English universities.
Vigurs, Katy, Jones, Steven and Harris, Diane 2016. Greater expectations of graduate futures? A comparative analysis of the views of the last generation of lower-fees undergraduates and the first generation of higher-fees undergraduates at two English universities. Society for Research into Higher Education.
Participants' productive disruption of a community photo-elicitation project: improvised methodologies in practice
Vigurs, Katy and Kara, Helen 2016. Participants' productive disruption of a community photo-elicitation project: improvised methodologies in practice. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1221259
Higher fees, higher debts: Unequal graduate transitions in England?
Vigurs, Katy, Jones, Steven, Everitt, Julia and Harris, Diane 2018. Higher fees, higher debts: Unequal graduate transitions in England? in: Emerald.
Twittering away - Is Twitter an appropriate adjunctive tool to enhance learning and engagement in higher education?
Vigurs, Katy, Boath, Elizabeth and Frangos, Juliet 2018. Twittering away - Is Twitter an appropriate adjunctive tool to enhance learning and engagement in higher education? Innovative Practice in Higher Education.
Personal guidance: What works?
Everitt, Julia, Neary, S., Delgado-Fuentes, Marco Antonio and Clark, Lewis 2018. Personal guidance: What works? The Careers & Enterprise Company.
The evidence base for careers websites. What works?
Vigurs, Katy, Everitt, Julia and Staunton, Tom 2017. The evidence base for careers websites. What works? Careers and Enterprise Company.
Developing a methodology for public engagement with critical research.
Boyask, Ruth and Vigurs, Katy 2017. Developing a methodology for public engagement with critical research. Policy Futures in Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210317739521
Progression for success: Evaluating North Yorkshire’s innovative careers guidance project
Moore, Nicki, Vigurs, Katy, Everitt, Julia and Clark, Lewis 2017. Progression for success: Evaluating North Yorkshire’s innovative careers guidance project. North Yorkshire County Council.