Explaining normative–deliberative gaps is essential to dual-process theorizing
|Linden J. Ball and Stupple, E.
We discuss significant challenges to assumptions of exclusivity and highlight methodological and conceptual pitfalls in inferring deliberative processes from reasoning responses. Causes of normative–deliberative gaps are considered (e.g., disputed or misunderstood normative standards, strategy preferences, task interpretations, cognitive ability, mindware and thinking dispositions) and a soft normativist approach is recommended for developing the dual-process 2.0 architecture.
|reasoning responses; normative–deliberative gaps; dual-process 2.0 architecture.
|Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|Oxford University Press
|Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
|Web address (URL)
|18 Jul 2023
|Publication process dates
|23 Aug 2023
0views this month
0downloads this month